nanog mailing list archives
Re: Slate Podcast on Estonian DOS atatck
From: Bill Woodcock <woody () pch net>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 04:09:51 -0700 (PDT)
On Thu, 24 May 2007, Alexander Harrowell wrote: > a) it wasn't really that serious, b) it was serious > but mitigation was successful, or c) being well-mitigated (BCP38 and > the like) from the word go, its seriousness or otherwise wasn't > obvious? Definitely (b). The EE-CERT was remarkably well-prepared and effective, and their counterparts around the world cooperated dilligently and professionally. It was a very large attack. -Bill
Current thread:
- Slate Podcast on Estonian DOS atatck Tom Vest (May 23)
- Re: Slate Podcast on Estonian DOS atatck Bill Woodcock (May 23)
- Re: Slate Podcast on Estonian DOS atatck Bill Woodcock (May 23)
- Re: Slate Podcast on Estonian DOS atatck Sean Donelan (May 23)
- Re: Slate Podcast on Estonian DOS atatck Bill Woodcock (May 23)
- Re: Slate Podcast on Estonian DOS atatck ge (May 23)
- Re: Slate Podcast on Estonian DOS atatck Alexander Harrowell (May 24)
- Re: Slate Podcast on Estonian DOS atatck Bill Woodcock (May 24)
- Re: Slate Podcast on Estonian DOS atatck Marshall Eubanks (May 24)
- Re: Slate Podcast on Estonian DOS atatck Merike Kaeo (May 24)
- RE: Slate Podcast on Estonian DOS atatck michael.dillon (May 24)
- Re: Slate Podcast on Estonian DOS atatck Merike Kaeo (May 24)
- Re: Slate Podcast on Estonian DOS atatck Bill Woodcock (May 24)
- Re: Slate Podcast on Estonian DOS atatck Danny McPherson (May 24)
- Re: Slate Podcast on Estonian DOS atatck Sean Donelan (May 24)
- Re: Slate Podcast on Estonian DOS atatck Chris L. Morrow (May 24)
- Re: Slate Podcast on Estonian DOS atatck Per Heldal (May 25)
- Re: Slate Podcast on Estonian DOS atatck Bill Woodcock (May 23)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Slate Podcast on Estonian DOS atatck Scott Weeks (May 23)