nanog mailing list archives
Re: Slate Podcast on Estonian DOS atatck
From: Bill Woodcock <woody () pch net>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 12:20:06 -0700 (PDT)
On Wed, 23 May 2007, Sean Donelan wrote: > I wonder, does this mean Estonia is now more likely to act/re-act to its > own homegrown miscreants which attack systems in other countries after > seeing the impact it had in their own country? Or is this going to remain > a case of the "bad guys" are always in some other country, not mine. By "bad guys" do you mean the bots, or the C&C? I think in non-state-actor attacks, prosecution of C&C has been reasonably good. It's the botnets that I worry about. All those people still paying Microsoft to make their machines zombies. :-/ -Bill
Current thread:
- Slate Podcast on Estonian DOS atatck Tom Vest (May 23)
- Re: Slate Podcast on Estonian DOS atatck Bill Woodcock (May 23)
- Re: Slate Podcast on Estonian DOS atatck Bill Woodcock (May 23)
- Re: Slate Podcast on Estonian DOS atatck Sean Donelan (May 23)
- Re: Slate Podcast on Estonian DOS atatck Bill Woodcock (May 23)
- Re: Slate Podcast on Estonian DOS atatck ge (May 23)
- Re: Slate Podcast on Estonian DOS atatck Alexander Harrowell (May 24)
- Re: Slate Podcast on Estonian DOS atatck Bill Woodcock (May 24)
- Re: Slate Podcast on Estonian DOS atatck Marshall Eubanks (May 24)
- Re: Slate Podcast on Estonian DOS atatck Merike Kaeo (May 24)
- RE: Slate Podcast on Estonian DOS atatck michael.dillon (May 24)
- Re: Slate Podcast on Estonian DOS atatck Merike Kaeo (May 24)
- Re: Slate Podcast on Estonian DOS atatck Bill Woodcock (May 24)
- Re: Slate Podcast on Estonian DOS atatck Danny McPherson (May 24)
- Re: Slate Podcast on Estonian DOS atatck Sean Donelan (May 24)
- Re: Slate Podcast on Estonian DOS atatck Bill Woodcock (May 23)