nanog mailing list archives
Re: Interesting new dns failures
From: Gadi Evron <ge () linuxbox org>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 07:19:28 -0500 (CDT)
On Mon, 21 May 2007, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 09:25:37PM -0700, Roger Marquis <marquis () roble com> wrote a message of 15 lines which said:If not, have any root nameservers been hacked?To partly answer my own question, no.I cannot find the original message in my mailbox. (Not on NANOG mailing list archives.) What was the issue?The data returned by root (gtld) nameservers is not changing rapidly.Now, I understand nothing. Is there a problem with the root nameservers or with some gTLD nameservers???
There is the issue of fastflux, and the possible solution of blacklisting at the TLDs. Both completely separate issues for discussion-sake, as flames can be avoided. Gadi.
Current thread:
- Re: Interesting new dns failures, (continued)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Suresh Ramasubramanian (May 24)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures John LaCour (May 24)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Suresh Ramasubramanian (May 24)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Hank Nussbacher (May 23)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Roger Marquis (May 22)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures David Ulevitch (May 22)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Chris L. Morrow (May 22)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Suresh Ramasubramanian (May 22)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Stephane Bortzmeyer (May 21)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Mark Andrews (May 21)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Gadi Evron (May 21)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Roger Marquis (May 21)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Valdis . Kletnieks (May 21)
- Use of portions of 44.0.0.0/8? Neal R (May 21)
- Re: Use of portions of 44.0.0.0/8? Andy Brezinsky (May 21)
- OK - functioning administration of 44.0.0.0/8 Neal R (May 21)
- Re: OK - functioning administration of 44.0.0.0/8 Harald Koch (May 21)