nanog mailing list archives
Re: Interesting new dns failures
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer () nic fr>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 10:13:22 +0200
On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 09:25:37PM -0700, Roger Marquis <marquis () roble com> wrote a message of 15 lines which said:
If not, have any root nameservers been hacked?To partly answer my own question, no.
I cannot find the original message in my mailbox. (Not on NANOG mailing list archives.) What was the issue?
The data returned by root (gtld) nameservers is not changing rapidly.
Now, I understand nothing. Is there a problem with the root nameservers or with some gTLD nameservers???
Current thread:
- Re: Interesting new dns failures, (continued)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Steve Atkins (May 24)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Per Heldal (May 24)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Suresh Ramasubramanian (May 24)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures John LaCour (May 24)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Suresh Ramasubramanian (May 24)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Hank Nussbacher (May 23)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Roger Marquis (May 22)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures David Ulevitch (May 22)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Chris L. Morrow (May 22)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Suresh Ramasubramanian (May 22)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Mark Andrews (May 21)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Gadi Evron (May 21)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Roger Marquis (May 21)
- Re: Interesting new dns failures Valdis . Kletnieks (May 21)
- Use of portions of 44.0.0.0/8? Neal R (May 21)
- Re: Use of portions of 44.0.0.0/8? Andy Brezinsky (May 21)
- OK - functioning administration of 44.0.0.0/8 Neal R (May 21)
- Re: OK - functioning administration of 44.0.0.0/8 Harald Koch (May 21)