nanog mailing list archives

Re: Broadband routers and botnets - being proactive


From: Adrian Chadd <adrian () creative net au>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 08:11:43 +0800


On Tue, May 15, 2007, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
michael.dillon () bt com wrote:
Addressing the complaint that my response to Gadi was too harsh, I can
only say
that, to someone who isn't aware of the history, my response may seem
harsh, 

I *AM* aware of the history and your response seems harsh. Especially so
because you complained about a message which was about exploits in CPE
access routers, not botnets. Any kind of router vulnerability/exploit is
on topic for NANOG. And people who don't take the trouble to read
messages and critique the message content, should not post to the list
at all. We don't need you using NANOG to fight your personal flamewar
with Gadi.

I don't see cpe as being all that different than hosts, except that
they're slower and less flexible.

I see them as more flexible - they don't have a CPE in front of them
potentially being a firewall, they can listen() on ports for p2p botnet
type action, and they can silently redirect your traffic to completely
different IPs or return bogus DNS info, they can see inside your home
network and be counted as "internal internet zone" to IE..

(perhaps not operational per-se, but pretty freaking scary.)



Adrian


Current thread: