Re: ISP CALEA compliance

["Mike Hammett" <nanog () ics-il net>]

I believe its everything.


-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jason Frisvold" <xenophage0 () gmail com>
To: "Jared Mauch" <jared () puck nether net>
Cc: "Nikos Mouat" <nikm () cyberflunk com>; <nanog () merit edu>
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 1:03 PM
Subject: Re: ISP CALEA compliance


> On 5/10/07, Jared Mauch <jared () puck nether net> wrote:
> >         If you're not offering VoIP services, your life may be easier as
> > you will only need to intercept the data.  Depending on your environment
> > you could do this with something like port-mirroring, or something
> > more advanced.  There are a number of folks that offer TTP (Trusted
> > third-provider) services.  Verisign comes to mind.  But using a TTP
> > doesn't mean you can hide behind them.  Compliance is ultimately your
> > (the company that gets the subponea) responsibility.
>
> Here's a question that's come up around here.  Does a CALEA intercept
> include "hairpining" or is it *only* traffic leaving your network?
> I'm of the opinion that a CALEA intercept request includes every bit
> of traffic being sent or received by the targeted individual, but
> there is strong opposition here that thinks only internet-related
> traffic counts.
>
> >         - Jared (IANAL!)
>
> --
> Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold
> XenoPhage0 () gmail com
> http://blog.godshell.com