nanog mailing list archives
Re: ISP CALEA compliance
From: Jeff Shultz <jeffshultz () wvi com>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 13:07:30 -0700
William Allen Simpson wrote:
Also, the gag order was ruled unconstitutional, so always inform your customer! They may be willing to work out attorney fees, and/or join you in a suppression hearing.
Huh? You can tell a customer that you've had a CALEA subpoena served on you for his/her/it's traffic?
Well, I guess it's a way to avoid having to be compliant since every customer will depart 5 seconds after you tell them. No need for the tap then.
-- Jeff Shultz
Current thread:
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance, (continued)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Joe Abley (May 23)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Chris L. Morrow (May 23)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Jared Mauch (May 23)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Steven M. Bellovin (May 23)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Randy Bush (May 23)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Steve Feldman (May 23)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Steven M. Bellovin (May 11)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Steven M. Bellovin (May 11)
- RE: ISP CALEA compliance Stasiniewicz, Adam (May 10)
- RE: ISP CALEA compliance Sean Donelan (May 10)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Jeff Shultz (May 10)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Jack Bates (May 10)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Donald Stahl (May 10)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Stephen Sprunk (May 10)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Jack Bates (May 11)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Donald Stahl (May 11)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Joe Provo (May 10)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Sean Donelan (May 10)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance David Lesher (May 10)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance Stephen Satchell (May 10)
- Re: ISP CALEA compliance William Allen Simpson (May 11)