nanog mailing list archives

RE: Level(3) faux paux

From: "Neil J. McRae" <neil () domino org>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 07:14:48 +0100

Maybe level 3 have more vocal or higher profile customer base? Personally speaking I've found level 3 to have 
outstanding service and network availibility.

Neil. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Security Admin (NetSec) <secadmin () netsecdesign com>
Sent: 12 July 2007 06:56
To: nanog () merit edu <nanog () merit edu>
Subject: Level(3) faux paux

I have noticed that Level(3) misconfigs/outages seem to happen more frequently than with most other Tier 1s.  Am 
unsure whether or not this is a mis-statement, but based on NANOG posts, Level(3) [AS3356] seems to show up more often 
with issues than say Sprint [AS1239].  Is their any one (or any coporation) that keeps track of outages such as these?  
Would think it might be a good thing to know for proper mulit-homing relationships to minimize the type of outage that 
Yahoo faced
 
SecAdmin (aka Edward Ray)

Current thread:

Level(3) faux paux Security Admin (NetSec) (Jul 11)
- Re: Level(3) faux paux Chris L. Morrow (Jul 11)
  - Re: Level(3) faux paux Charles Yamasaki (Jul 11)
- Re: Level(3) faux paux trainier (Jul 12)
- Re: Level(3) faux paux Valdis . Kletnieks (Jul 12)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Level(3) faux paux Neil J. McRae (Jul 11)
- RE: Level(3) faux paux David Hubbard (Jul 12)