nanog mailing list archives

Re: An Internet IPv6 Transition Plan


From: Stephen Wilcox <steve.wilcox () packetrade com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 11:18:58 +0100


On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 06:15:23PM -0500, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
On 25-jul-2007, at 6:30, Stephen Wilcox wrote:

I think the combined effect of these things means
- we will not be running into a wall at any time
- availability of IPs will slowly decrease over time (as cost  
slowly increases)

I have to disagree here. 10% of the requests are for 90% of the 170 -  
200 million IPv4 addresses given out per year. These are going to  
large broadband ISPs in blocks of a quarter million or (much) larger,  
upto /8. At some point, the RIRs will be out of large enough blocks  
to satisfy these requests. Nothing to be done about that.

um, so thats consistent with what i said.. in fact it implies only a very small number of organisations need to pay 
close attention and those are the ones best suited to implementing policy changes to ensure their users continue to 
have a good service

this means 90% of orgs can probably wait and see what the 10% do first..

Steve


Current thread: