nanog mailing list archives

Re: Site Survey...


From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 15:21:38 -0500

On Thu, 25 Jan 2007 14:49:55 EST, "Dwight A. Ernest" said:
I don't see what "reasonable" has to do with it. If you don't like it, 
and you have a choice, vote with your pocketbook by taking your business 
elsewhere.

If you don't have a choice, and your carrier knows it, then you have 
little recourse except where it might affect business elsewhere.

I would use whatever stick or carrot I could,

Favorite stick: "Remember, we can turn off the telephones, electricity
and air conditioning in your NOC". :)

                                              but reasonableness only 
rarely enters into carrier business ethics.

It all depends on the definition of "reasonable" - remembering that the carrier
is likely a corporation, and thus has a duty to maximize profit, "reasonable"
means "worth a try to extract more revenue from the customer with little chance
of repercussions".  It's similar to "ethics" when applied to lawyers - you may
dislike being on the losing end, but it's rare enough that lawyers violate
their code of ethics that it makes the news when it happens.

Attachment: _bin
Description:


Current thread: