nanog mailing list archives
Re: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 07:49:40 +0800
bmanning () karoshi com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 08:25:13AM +0900, Randy Bush wrote:i know its all the rage to post/shame the offending parties (those whois filtering policies don't reflect our own)bull we are trying to validate experimental results. sorry if that offends you or you do your research result validation differently.none taken... although "name/shame" as a technique for validating experimetnal results is a tried & ture method, an equally valid technique is to look in the other direction and praise/name those whose practices match your expected results. ... i'd prefer to see the full curve, not just the sigma-six folks on the left side.
your issues might be better based if you knew anything about what was happening instead of shooting off mouth in dark. as i already said, but somehow you missed. preso will be this afternoon (gmt+8). i will try to post a pointer here. randy randy
Current thread:
- 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons Eric Ortega (Feb 26)
- Re: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons James Blessing (Feb 26)
- RE: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons Eric Ortega (Feb 26)
- RE: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons Eric Ortega (Feb 28)
- RE: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons Eric Ortega (Feb 26)
- RE: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons Frank Bulk (Feb 26)
- RE: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons Randy Bush (Feb 26)
- RE: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons Frank Bulk (Feb 26)
- Re: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons bmanning (Feb 26)
- Re: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons Randy Bush (Feb 26)
- Re: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons bmanning (Feb 27)
- Re: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons Randy Bush (Feb 27)
- Re: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons bmanning (Feb 27)
- Re: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons Randy Bush (Feb 27)
- RE: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons Randy Bush (Feb 26)
- Re: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons James Blessing (Feb 26)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons Fergie (Feb 27)