nanog mailing list archives

Re: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons

From: bmanning () karoshi com
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 23:26:35 +0000



i know its all the rage to post/shame the offending parties (those whois filtering
policies don't reflect our own) - BUT -   how hard would it be for you perl jocks
to publish the ASNs of the "good guys"

--bill

Current thread:

96.2.0.0/16 Bogons Eric Ortega (Feb 26)
- Re: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons James Blessing (Feb 26)
  - RE: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons Eric Ortega (Feb 26)
    - RE: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons Eric Ortega (Feb 28)
- RE: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons Frank Bulk (Feb 26)
  - RE: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons Randy Bush (Feb 26)
    - RE: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons Frank Bulk (Feb 26)
    - Re: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons bmanning (Feb 26)
    - Re: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons Randy Bush (Feb 26)
    - Re: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons bmanning (Feb 27)
    - Re: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons Randy Bush (Feb 27)
    - Re: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons bmanning (Feb 27)
    - Re: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons Randy Bush (Feb 27)
- Re: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons Randy Bush (Feb 26)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons Fergie (Feb 27)