nanog mailing list archives
Re: Solaris telnet vuln solutions digest and network risks
From: "MARLON BORBA" <MBORBA () trf3 gov br>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 12:59:17 -0200
I agree with Gadi. Everything which affects Internet stability (e.g. DNS denial-of-service attacks) deserves attention of network operators. IMHO it's time to think about a new NANOG AUP. If, as Gadi says, "not all of us can handle all that an ISP would care", all of us (network operators, sysadmins, CISSPs ;-)) MUST work together (with the best of everyone's experience and knowledge) to bring a cleaner, safer, faster Internet for everyone. Marlon Borba, CISSP
Gadi Evron <ge () linuxbox org> 14/2/2007 10:09:30 >>>
[...] We may not care about phishing or this or that virus here, but we do about things we need to *deal with on our networks*. By we I obviously can't mean all of us, but not all of us can handle all that an ISP would care about from a network standpoint. Some only care about BGP, others only about DNS. Yet more others only about security. What we have here is a clash of cultures with changing times. Gadi.
Current thread:
- RE: Solaris telnet vuln solutions digest and network risks michael.dillon (Feb 14)
- Re: Solaris telnet vuln solutions digest and network risks Robert E. Seastrom (Feb 14)
- Re: Solaris telnet vuln solutions digest and network risks Gadi Evron (Feb 14)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Solaris telnet vuln solutions digest and network risks MARLON BORBA (Feb 14)
- Re: Solaris telnet vuln solutions digest and network risks Joe Abley (Feb 14)
- Re: Solaris telnet vuln solutions digest and network risks Robert E. Seastrom (Feb 14)