nanog mailing list archives
Re: Every incident is an opportunity (was Re: Hackers hit key Internet traffic computers)
From: Gadi Evron <ge () linuxbox org>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 03:39:28 -0600 (CST)
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007, Alexander Harrowell wrote:
On 2/12/07, Gadi Evron <ge () linuxbox org> wrote:As a very smart person said a couple of weeks ago when this same argument was made: are you willing to do tech-support for my mother is she uses linux? Gadi.Name anyone techie who doesn't have to do tech support for their mother on MS Windows..
Especially on family holidays, right? Tech support on usability is not that much of an issue as it is on Linux, whether because of years of use and becoming used to the Microsoft interface, or because no matter what Linux is just not that user friendly. Tech support on Windows has interface questions, but much less than on Linux. The real question is, are you willing to support my mother, too? 1. What would be the cost of doing such tech support at an ISP compared to Windows? 2. How secure would Linux be if massively used and in a default installation. We already have massive Linux server botnets, let's avoid the home users. x Gadi.
Current thread:
- Re: Every incident is an opportunity (was Re: Hackers hit key Internet traffic computers), (continued)
- Re: Every incident is an opportunity (was Re: Hackers hit key Internet traffic computers) Steven M. Bellovin (Feb 11)
- RE: Every incident is an opportunity (was Re: Hackers hit key Internet traffic computers) Stasiniewicz, Adam (Feb 11)
- Re: Every incident is an opportunity (was Re: Hackers hit key Internet traffic computers) Gadi Evron (Feb 11)
- Re: Every incident is an opportunity (was Re: Hackers hit key Internet traffic computers) Sean Donelan (Feb 11)
- Re: Every incident is an opportunity (was Re: Hackers hit key Internet traffic computers) Gadi Evron (Feb 12)
- Re: Every incident is an opportunity (was Re: Hackers hit key Internet traffic computers) Stephane Bortzmeyer (Feb 12)
- Re: Every incident is an opportunity (was Re: Hackers hit key Internet traffic computers) Gadi Evron (Feb 12)
- Re: Every incident is an opportunity (was Re: Hackers hit key Internet traffic computers) Stephane Bortzmeyer (Feb 12)
- Re: Every incident is an opportunity (was Re: Hackers hit key Internet traffic computers) Alexander Harrowell (Feb 12)
- Re: Every incident is an opportunity (was Re: Hackers hit key Internet traffic computers) Stephane Bortzmeyer (Feb 12)
- Re: Every incident is an opportunity (was Re: Hackers hit key Internet traffic computers) Gadi Evron (Feb 12)
- Re: Every incident is an opportunity (was Re: Hackers hit key Internet traffic computers) Marshall Eubanks (Feb 12)
- Re: Every incident is an opportunity (was Re: Hackers hit key Internet traffic computers) Dave Pooser (Feb 12)
- Re: Every incident is an opportunity (was Re: Hackers hit key Internet traffic computers) D'Arcy J.M. Cain (Feb 12)
- Re: Every incident is an opportunity (was Re: Hackers hit key Internet traffic computers) Seth Johnson (Feb 19)
- Re: Every incident is an opportunity (was Re: Hackers hit key Internet traffic computers) D'Arcy J.M. Cain (Feb 12)
- Re: Every incident is an opportunity (was Re: Hackers hit key Internet traffic computers) Per Heldal (Feb 12)
- motivating security, was Re: Every incident... Edward Lewis (Feb 12)
- Re: motivating security, was Re: Every incident... Per Heldal (Feb 12)
- Re: motivating security, was Re: Every incident... John Bittenbender (Feb 13)
- Re: motivating security, was Re: Every incident... coonrad (Feb 12)