nanog mailing list archives
Re: v6 subnet size for DSL & leased line customers
From: Mark Smith <nanog () 85d5b20a518b8f6864949bd940457dc124746ddc nosense org>
Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2007 15:36:47 +1030
On Mon, 24 Dec 2007 09:58:44 +0900 Randy Bush <randy () psg com> wrote:
There's a tendency to move away from (simulated) shared media networks. "One host per subnet" might become the norm.and, with multiple addresses per interface, the home user surely _might_ need a /32.
What prompted you to suggest that? Trolling maybe?
might does not make right
Neither does being ridiculous.
randy
-- "Sheep are slow and tasty, and therefore must remain constantly alert." - Bruce Schneier, "Beyond Fear"
Current thread:
- Re: v6 subnet size for DSL & leased line customers, (continued)
- Re: v6 subnet size for DSL & leased line customers Jeroen Massar (Dec 25)
- Re: v6 subnet size for DSL & leased line customers Paul Jakma (Dec 25)
- Re: v6 subnet size for DSL & leased line customers Christopher Morrow (Dec 21)
- Re: v6 subnet size for DSL & leased line customers Florian Weimer (Dec 23)
- Re: v6 subnet size for DSL & leased line customers Chris Adams (Dec 23)
- Re: v6 subnet size for DSL & leased line customers David Barak (Dec 23)
- Re: v6 subnet size for DSL & leased line customers Mark Andrews (Dec 23)
- Re: v6 subnet size for DSL & leased line customers Joe Greco (Dec 23)
- Re: v6 subnet size for DSL & leased line customers Mark Smith (Dec 23)
- Re: v6 subnet size for DSL & leased line customers Randy Bush (Dec 23)
- Re: v6 subnet size for DSL & leased line customers Mark Smith (Dec 23)
- Re: v6 subnet size for DSL & leased line customers Jeroen Massar (Dec 21)
- Re: v6 subnet size for DSL & leased line customers Simon Lyall (Dec 21)
- Re: v6 subnet size for DSL & leased line customers Randy Bush (Dec 21)
- Re: v6 subnet size for DSL & leased line customers Simon Lyall (Dec 21)
- Re: v6 subnet size for DSL & leased line customers Randy Bush (Dec 21)