nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 network boundaries vs. IPv4
From: John Osmon <josmon () rigozsaurus com>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 13:12:09 -0600
On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 07:12:54AM -0400, Jason LeBlanc wrote:
OT: He probably meant MOP and LAT are not routable, man that brings back memories.
Yeah, I realy did, but my fingers typed 'decnet isn't routable' because that how the folks I worked with at the time described the issue. I was young at the time, and didn't understand the nuances (as opposed to being older and missing nuances now). My old nuerons took over when I composed the message, sorry for the confusion. Thanks to all the folks that have replied off-list. The (on topic) answers are coming where I expected them: - keep routing boundaries congruent - at local edges / stubs do whatever you want, but do it in private, and wash your hands afterwards (with appologies to R.A. Heinlein)
Current thread:
- IPv6 network boundaries vs. IPv4 John Osmon (Aug 25)
- Re: IPv6 network boundaries vs. IPv4 Peter Dambier (Aug 26)
- DECNet Good Old Days (spun from ...network boundaries...) James R. Cutler (Aug 26)
- Re: IPv6 network boundaries vs. IPv4 Kevin Oberman (Aug 26)
- Re: IPv6 network boundaries vs. IPv4 Jason LeBlanc (Aug 27)
- Re: IPv6 network boundaries vs. IPv4 John Osmon (Aug 27)
- Re: IPv6 network boundaries vs. IPv4 Jason LeBlanc (Aug 27)
- Re: IPv6 network boundaries vs. IPv4 Iljitsch van Beijnum (Aug 27)
- Re: IPv6 network boundaries vs. IPv4 Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 27)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: IPv6 network boundaries vs. IPv4 John van Oppen (Aug 27)
- Any MSN/Live Mail Admin Contacts? Raymond L. Corbin (Aug 27)
- Re: Any MSN/Live Mail Admin Contacts? Martin Hannigan (Aug 27)
- Any MSN/Live Mail Admin Contacts? Raymond L. Corbin (Aug 27)
- Re: IPv6 network boundaries vs. IPv4 Peter Dambier (Aug 26)