nanog mailing list archives
IPv6 network boundaries vs. IPv4
From: John Osmon <josmon () rigozsaurus com>
Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2007 23:56:29 -0600
Is anyone out there setting up routing boundaries differently for IPv4 and IPv6? I'm setting up a network where it seems to make sense to route IPv4, while bridging IPv6 -- but I can be talked out of it rather easily. Years ago, I worked on a academic network where we had a mix of IPX, DECnet, Appletalk, and IP(v4). Not all of the routers actually routed each protocol -- DECnet wasn't routable, and I recall some routers that routed IPX, while bridging IP... This all made sense at the time -- there were IPX networks that needed to be split, while IP didn't need to be. DECnet was... DECnet -- and Appletalk was chatty, but useful. I keep hearing the mantra in my head of: "I want my routers to route, and my switches to switch." I agree wholeheartedly if there is only one protocol -- but with the mix of IPv4 and IPv6, are there any folks doing things differently? With a new protocol in the mix are the lessons of the last 10 (or so) years not as clear-cut?
Current thread:
- IPv6 network boundaries vs. IPv4 John Osmon (Aug 25)
- Re: IPv6 network boundaries vs. IPv4 Peter Dambier (Aug 26)
- DECNet Good Old Days (spun from ...network boundaries...) James R. Cutler (Aug 26)
- Re: IPv6 network boundaries vs. IPv4 Kevin Oberman (Aug 26)
- Re: IPv6 network boundaries vs. IPv4 Jason LeBlanc (Aug 27)
- Re: IPv6 network boundaries vs. IPv4 John Osmon (Aug 27)
- Re: IPv6 network boundaries vs. IPv4 Jason LeBlanc (Aug 27)
- Re: IPv6 network boundaries vs. IPv4 Iljitsch van Beijnum (Aug 27)
- Re: IPv6 network boundaries vs. IPv4 Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 27)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: IPv6 network boundaries vs. IPv4 John van Oppen (Aug 27)
- Any MSN/Live Mail Admin Contacts? Raymond L. Corbin (Aug 27)
- Re: Any MSN/Live Mail Admin Contacts? Martin Hannigan (Aug 27)
- Any MSN/Live Mail Admin Contacts? Raymond L. Corbin (Aug 27)
- Re: IPv6 network boundaries vs. IPv4 Peter Dambier (Aug 26)