nanog mailing list archives
Re: question on algorithm for radius based accouting
From: Ian Mason <nanog () ian co uk>
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 13:30:31 +0100
On 17 Aug 2007, at 04:52, Alex Rubenstein wrote:
My question is: what's the best algorithm for constrcting broadband access record from radius accouting packets?
[snip]
They should yield (approximately) the same result. But, to be pedantic,you haven't accounted for latency within the network.
Somebody should be whipped, either for: 1) If you can find a network where that matters, even in the slightest, the oerson responsible for the design and/or maintainance OR 2) You, for making even this aged arch-pedant wince. :-) Seriously, can I also add that RADIUS interim accounting is almost essential in this scenario. Real world accounting and session boundaries mis-match badly making it almost mandatory to use interim accounting records to get an approximation of what the figures look like from a billing perspective. I'll also add "watch out for missing records" - I've found RADIUS to be the lossiest network protocol per foot of cabling that I've ever used.
Current thread:
- question on algorithm for radius based accouting Joe Shen (Aug 16)
- RE: question on algorithm for radius based accouting Alex Rubenstein (Aug 16)
- Re: question on algorithm for radius based accouting Ian Mason (Aug 17)
- RE: question on algorithm for radius based accouting Alex Rubenstein (Aug 17)
- Re: question on algorithm for radius based accouting Hugh Irvine (Aug 18)
- Re: question on algorithm for radius based accouting Ian Mason (Aug 20)
- Re: question on algorithm for radius based accouting Ian Mason (Aug 17)
- RE: question on algorithm for radius based accouting Alex Rubenstein (Aug 16)