nanog mailing list archives
Re: [policy] When Tech Meets Policy...
From: John Levine <johnl () iecc com>
Date: 15 Aug 2007 16:16:22 -0000
to be very clear, this 'domain tasting' (no matter if you like it or not) is just using a 'loophole' in the policy/purchase that's there for the safe guarding of normal folks.
You know, repeating this over and over doesn't make it true. The AGP is a loophole that was added to the registry contracts by ICANN's staff without any meaningful debate or oversight. The problem it purports to solve did not and does not exist. The AGP, and domain tasting, should just go away. R's, John
Current thread:
- Re: [policy] When Tech Meets Policy..., (continued)
- Re: [policy] When Tech Meets Policy... Carl Karsten (Aug 14)
- Re: [policy] When Tech Meets Policy... Steve Atkins (Aug 13)
- Re: [policy] When Tech Meets Policy... Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 13)
- Re: [policy] When Tech Meets Policy... Chris L. Morrow (Aug 13)
- Re: [policy] When Tech Meets Policy... Carl Karsten (Aug 13)
- Re: [policy] When Tech Meets Policy... Chris L. Morrow (Aug 13)
- Re: [policy] When Tech Meets Policy... John Levine (Aug 13)
- Re: [policy] When Tech Meets Policy... Jeremy Hanmer (Aug 13)
- Re: [policy] When Tech Meets Policy... John Levine (Aug 13)
- Message not available
- Re: [policy] When Tech Meets Policy... Chris L. Morrow (Aug 13)
- Re: [policy] When Tech Meets Policy... John Levine (Aug 15)
- Re: [policy] When Tech Meets Policy... Carl Karsten (Aug 13)
- Re: [policy] When Tech Meets Policy... Dorn Hetzel (Aug 13)
- Re: [policy] When Tech Meets Policy... Dorn Hetzel (Aug 13)
- Re: [policy] When Tech Meets Policy... Andrew Sullivan (Aug 15)
- Re: [policy] When Tech Meets Policy... Warren Kumari (Aug 15)