nanog mailing list archives

Re: On-going Internet Emergency and Domain Names


From: Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () cisco com>
Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 20:15:58 -0700



On Apr 1, 2007, at 6:16 PM, Douglas Otis wrote:

 Reacting to new domains after the fact is often too late.

What happens when they're wrong?

And who's 'they', btw? What qualifications must 'they' have? And what happens if a registrar disagrees with 'them'? Or when 'they' are instructed by their governments to objection to a domain because of its perceived lack of redeeming social value, or somesuch?

It seems to me as if we've just talked through the institutionalization of the Department of Domain Pre-Crime, with all that entails. It could be argued that the proposed solution might be worse than the problem it's purporting to solve.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () cisco com> // 408.527.6376 voice

        Words that come from a machine have no soul.

                      -- Duong Van Ngo


Current thread: