nanog mailing list archives

Re: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks


From: Chris Owen <owenc () hubris net>
Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 18:45:20 -0500


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Apr 7, 2007, at 11:41 PM, Fergie wrote:

Please read what I wrote:

"I would think that it's actually very easy to do when
sub-allocations are SWIP'ed."

I cannot, and will not, presuppose that in cases when they are
not SWIP'ed that some kind of magic happens. :-)

And how do you know the difference? The Cox IP address is SWIPed. Its even sub-allocated. The allocation is just a /19.

Chris

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Chris Owen         ~ Garden City (620) 275-1900 ~  Lottery (noun):
President          ~ Wichita     (316) 858-3000 ~    A stupidity tax
Hubris Communications Inc      www.hubris.net
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~




-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFGGC0QElUlCLUT2d0RAsmbAJ4i/YNj7vypKJ0Zv/7ajWIGdpwvbgCdECZB
v+FoC+s1TRkdkSBZMzEYU94=
=6CPl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Current thread: