nanog mailing list archives

Re: New router feature - icmp error source-interface [was: icmp rpf]


From: "Chris L. Morrow" <christopher.morrow () verizonbusiness com>
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 02:29:50 +0000 (GMT)


On Mon, 25 Sep 2006, Joseph S D Yao wrote:


On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 09:22:34AM -0400, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
...
Who thinks it would be a "good idea" to have a knob such that ICMP
error messages are always source from a certain IP address on a router?
...


I've sometimes thought it would be useful when I wanted to hide a route.
But security via obscurity just makes it that much harder to fix

I think in the original poster's scenario one network was looking to
protect their resources/equipment from a majority of the network's ills.
It's not unreasonable... atleast not in my mind. It's also not 'security
through obscurity' since one of the parties is/was leaking their
information OUT, just not 'in' :)

something.  Many more times than this would have been useful, I've been
able to identify at which router a problem was by a 'traceroute' that

What's interesting is that today, in many networks, the usefulness of
traceeroute has bee degraded by other non-ip issues (<cough>mpls</cough>)
not in ALL cases, but certainly in many you are not seeing quite what
you'd expect from the traceroute :(


Current thread: