nanog mailing list archives
Re: icmp rpf
From: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick () ianai net>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 14:59:04 -0400
On Sep 25, 2006, at 12:22 PM, Mark Kent wrote:
Jared Mauch wrote:I would hope they're doing it for more than just ICMP packets.yes, loose RPF, but I just care about ICMP.I would argue should be, or is a current best practice.OK, so I must have missed the memo :-)
It's been all the rage. :)
Who among AS1239, AS701, AS3356, AS7018, AS209 does loose RPF (not just strict RPF on single-homed customers)?
I'm wondering why that is relevant.If all those ASNs only filtered on ASN instead of prefix for customer announcements (for instance), would that mean no one should?
-- TTFN, patrick
Current thread:
- Re: Comcast contact, (continued)
- Re: Comcast contact Peter Cohen (Sep 26)
- Re: New router feature - icmp error source-interface [was: icmp rpf] John Curran (Sep 25)
- Re: New router feature - icmp error source-interface [was: icmp rpf] Richard A Steenbergen (Sep 25)
- Re: New router feature - icmp error source-interface [was: icmp rpf] Joseph S D Yao (Sep 25)
- Re: New router feature - icmp error source-interface [was: icmp rpf] Chris L. Morrow (Sep 25)
- Re: New router feature - icmp error source-interface [was: icmp rpf] Daniel Senie (Sep 25)
- Re: New router feature - icmp error source-interface [was: icmp rpf] Payam Tarverdyan Chychi (Sep 25)
- Re: icmp rpf Mark Kent (Sep 25)
- Re: icmp rpf Patrick W. Gilmore (Sep 25)
- Re: icmp rpf Patrick W. Gilmore (Sep 26)
- Re: icmp rpf Jared Mauch (Sep 26)