nanog mailing list archives

Re: that 4byte ASN you were considering...


From: Henk Uijterwaal <henk () ripe net>
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 13:56:09 +0200


At 13:34 10/10/2006, Michael.Dillon () btradianz com wrote:


My point is that if we do NOT introduce a special notation
for ASnums greater than 65536, then tools only need to be
checked, not updated. If your tool was written by someone
who left the company 7 years ago then you might want to
do such checking by simply testing it with large as numbers,
not by inspecting the code. The dot notation requires that
somebody goes in and updates/fixes all these old tools.

I don't agree with you but this is a valid argument.  I suggest you
make it to the IESG before they decide.

Henk


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Henk Uijterwaal                           Email: henk.uijterwaal(at)ripe.net
RIPE Network Coordination Centre          http://www.amsterdamned.org/~henk
P.O.Box 10096          Singel 258         Phone: +31.20.5354414
1001 EB Amsterdam      1016 AB Amsterdam  Fax: +31.20.5354445
The Netherlands        The Netherlands    Mobile: +31.6.55861746
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1160438400 + 381600 = 1160820000.

Current thread: