nanog mailing list archives
Re: that 4byte ASN you were considering...
From: "william(at)elan.net" <william () elan net>
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 11:28:30 -0700 (PDT)
On Tue, 10 Oct 2006, Kevin Loch wrote:
Randy Bush wrote:- 'Canonical representation of 4-byte AS numbers '<draft-michaelson-4byte-as-representation-01.txt> as an Informational RFCand what is good or bad about this representation? seems simple to me. and having one notation seems reasonable. what am i missing?Using '.' as a delimiter will be somewhat annoying when used in regular expressions and likely to induce errors. Would '-' be a better choice?
No. We already use "." for number of ip resources so this is good. I suspect new tools & config systems will also accept full 32bit number as well (just like its sometimes possible with ip addresses) which will give you way out if you do not like "." in ASN. And regular ASNs < 65k will work without "0." in this way as well. -- William Leibzon Elan Networks william () elan net
Current thread:
- that 4byte ASN you were considering... bmanning (Oct 09)
- Re: that 4byte ASN you were considering... Randy Bush (Oct 09)
- Re: that 4byte ASN you were considering... Kevin Loch (Oct 09)
- Re: that 4byte ASN you were considering... Randy Bush (Oct 10)
- RE: that 4byte ASN you were considering... Neil J. McRae (Oct 10)
- Re: that 4byte ASN you were considering... David W. Hankins (Oct 10)
- Re: that 4byte ASN you were considering... Joe Abley (Oct 10)
- Re: that 4byte ASN you were considering... David W. Hankins (Oct 10)
- Re: that 4byte ASN you were considering... Michael Shields (Oct 10)
- Re: that 4byte ASN you were considering... David W. Hankins (Oct 10)
- Re: that 4byte ASN you were considering... Kevin Loch (Oct 09)
- Re: that 4byte ASN you were considering... Randy Bush (Oct 09)
- Re: that 4byte ASN you were considering... william(at)elan.net (Oct 10)
- Message not available
- Re: that 4byte ASN you were considering... Henk Uijterwaal (Oct 10)
- Re: that 4byte ASN you were considering... Michael . Dillon (Oct 10)
- Message not available
- Re: that 4byte ASN you were considering... Henk Uijterwaal (Oct 10)
- AW: that 4byte ASN you were considering... Gunther Stammwitz (Oct 10)
- Re: that 4byte ASN you were considering... Larry Blunk (Oct 10)