nanog mailing list archives

Re: Boeing's Connexion announcement


From: Robert E.Seastrom <rs () seastrom com>
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 07:16:01 -0400



Fascinating...  of course, you can see where the confusion came from,
particularly given the source of some of the components and the fact
that they're not actually committed until they get the orders (hence,
no satellite capacity online _today_).  Thanks for the additional
data; I'm sure everyone here will be watching this one closely; the
"email/web/irc/AIM from the skies" imperative runs quite high in our
community ;-)

                                        ---rob


Fearghas McKay <fm-lists () st-kilda org> writes:

At 17:39 -0400 13/10/06, Robert E.Seastrom wrote:

As I understand it, Panasonic's product is different, cheaper, and not
a turnkey service (they don't have their own satellite transponder
constellation).  It is aimed at nation-states, not the commercial
market.

Not according to this news story. (Full text below)

http://www.shephard.co.uk/Inflight/Default.aspx?Action=-1000945703&ID=78b42b71-21f5-4d2e-8703-6387a7a39a0b

They are contracting to airlines and will proceed if they can get 500 planes guaranteed by the end of the year.

      f

INFLIGHT ONLINE EXCLUSIVE: Panasonic reaches for the Connexion torch

September 19, 2006 - JUST when the Inmarsat community was relishing the prospect of an unobstructed run at the 
passenger broadband market, Panasonic has announced a plan to take up where Connexion by Boeing left off. The IFE 
giant has no intention of rushing in, though, and will not launch unless it has commitments covering a critical mass 
of aircraft. 
"We have a complete system designed, developed and ready to go," strategic marketing director David Bruner told 
Inflight Online at the WAEA show in Miami Beach last week. "But we're determined to avoid one of the things that 
brought Connexion down - lack of an initial fleet big enough to assure acceptable pricing for the airlines."
Panasonic has set about securing agreements covering a minimum of 500 aircraft in the next 60 days. That schedule is 
being driven by the need to be ready to serve ex-Connexion airlines within a tolerable time after the discontinuation 
of that service by the end of the year. "We can't drag our launch decision on until, say, February," Bruner said. 
"There will inevitably be a dark period between the end of Connexion and the start of our service, and we want to 
keep that as short as possible. We already have 150 aircraft committed and feel confident we'll make the 500. But if 
we're falling badly short in 60 days' time we will not go."
Early takers would enjoy significant advantages over airlines that were slower of the mark, Bruner said. "In return 
for a minimum five-year commitment we'll reward our launch customers with very preferential service pricing, and they 
will also get priority access to bandwidth."
Panasonic's standard wholesale price to the airlines would represent a comparatively small premium on terrestrial 
broadband access tariffs, Bruner said. "So far we are seeing little indication that the airlines are planning to mark 
this up for passengers. It's a service they want to offer - they don't currently see it as a revenue-generator."
The new offering is designed to be as attractive as possible to airlines that are already equipped for Connexion. 
"Our solution for them is to replace only the modem on the aircraft and leave all the rest of the hardware, including 
the antenna, in place," said Bruner. "That will spare them the expense of reversing the Connexion installations and 
then putting in our definitive equipment suite."
That includes a compact Ku-band antenna from Californian-based L-3 Datron Advanced Technologies. Another L-3 
Communications operation, the Linkabit division, is supplying the modem. Both are already fully developed for US 
military applications and have been modified for civil use by removing the encryption provision. Working with an 
existing Ku-band satellite system, the hardware is capable of delivering 12Mbit/sec to the aircraft and 3Mbit/sec in 
the opposite direction, according to Bruner.
Panasonic has selected a single Ku-band satellite operator to provide transponder capacity and geographical coverage 
at least equivalent to Connexion's. "With an initial fleet of 500 aircraft we would anyway pay significantly less for 
transponders than Connexion," Bruner pointed out. "But our technical solution will also be more efficient than 
theirs, allowing us to put more traffic through each transponder and thus reduce our total requirement for satellite 
capacity."
Panasonic saw itself as a system designer and integrator and had no intention of incurring the costs associated with 
being a service provider, Bruner said. The as yet unidentified satellite operator would be responsible for system 
management, operation and capacity planning, and Panasonic is in talks with a global wireless roaming company for the 
provision of services such as customer care, billing and retail promotion. 
"We're intent on learning from what happened to Connexion," said Bruner. "9/11 lost them their start-up fleet, and 
after that they were always struggling to catch up. Our onboard equipment is lighter and cheaper, and our approach to 
buying transponder capacity is altogether more economical. We think these advantages will persuade the airlines and 
that in a couple of months' time we'll be ready to go ahead."
Should the magic 500 not be achieved, however, Panasonic will continue to look for another way into connectivity. "If 
Ku-band proves not to make sense after all, then we'll go down another path," Bruner concluded.
At least one other passenger communications provider will be watching developments carefully. AeroMobile is currently 
to committed to L-band operator Inmarsat as the bearer system for its soon to be introduced onboard cellphone 
offering. But it is also looking to offer email and Internet/VPN access in the longer term, and would be open to 
integration with the Panasonic Ku-band system in the same way its new GSM/GPRS cellular offering is being integrated 
with the company's onboard IFE infrastructure.
"We're completely agnostic when it comes to air-to-ground data pipes," commented AeroMobile strategic relationships 
and marketing director David Coiley. "In the end we could find ourselves working with Inmarsat, Panasonic and even 
the AirCell terrestrial broadband system in North America."


Current thread: