nanog mailing list archives
Re: MEDIA: ICANN rejects .xxx domain
From: Joe Abley <jabley () ca afilias info>
Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 15:28:36 +0300
On 12-May-2006, at 01:17, Martin Hannigan wrote:
At 2:43 PM -0400 05:11:2006, Eric Brunner-Williams wrote:the how-to-label problem has been around since the w3c's pics effort. the jurisdictional issue is aterritorial,Negative. 92% of the root is under US jurisdiction
How are you measuring the root, for the purposes of that assertion? Joe
Current thread:
- Re: MEDIA: ICANN rejects .xxx domain, (continued)
- Re: MEDIA: ICANN rejects .xxx domain Eric Brunner-Williams (May 12)
- Re: MEDIA: ICANN rejects .xxx domain Simon Waters (May 15)
- Re: MEDIA: ICANN rejects .xxx domain Michael . Dillon (May 15)
- Re: MEDIA: ICANN rejects .xxx domain Peter Dambier (May 15)
- Re: MEDIA: ICANN rejects .xxx domain Niels Bakker (May 15)
- Re: MEDIA: ICANN rejects .xxx domain Peter Dambier (May 12)
- Re: MEDIA: ICANN rejects .xxx domain Steve Sobol (May 12)
- Re: MEDIA: ICANN rejects .xxx domain Martin Hannigan (May 11)
- Re: MEDIA: ICANN rejects .xxx domain Martin Hannigan (May 11)
- Re: MEDIA: ICANN rejects .xxx domain Joe Abley (May 12)
- Re: MEDIA: ICANN rejects .xxx domain Eric Brunner-Williams (May 12)
- Re: MEDIA: ICANN rejects .xxx domain Greg Taylor (May 12)
- Re: MEDIA: ICANN rejects .xxx domain John Palmer (NANOG Acct) (May 12)
- Re: MEDIA: ICANN rejects .xxx domain Warren Kumari (May 12)
- Re: MEDIA: ICANN rejects .xxx domain John Palmer (NANOG Acct) (May 12)
- Re: MEDIA: ICANN rejects .xxx domain Matt Ghali (May 13)
- Re: MEDIA: ICANN rejects .xxx domain Derek J. Balling (May 11)
- Re: MEDIA: ICANN rejects .xxx domain Todd Vierling (May 11)
- Re: MEDIA: ICANN rejects .xxx domain Peter Dambier (May 12)