nanog mailing list archives
Re: Presumed RF Interference
From: Andrew C Burnette <acb () acb net>
Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2006 15:29:16 -0500
Ian Mason wrote:
On 6 Mar 2006, at 15:06, ww () styx org wrote:On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 09:49:39AM -0500, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:On Mon, 06 Mar 2006 21:17:17 +1100 Matthew Sullivan <matthew () sorbs net> wrote:(In the UK where I served my apprenticeship, we were required to provide earth bonding to the copper plumbing system, additional bonding at everyexposed fitting - this caused a few issues when plumbers first startingusing PVC pipes)...The US National Electrical Code (which has no national force of law; it's a model code voluntarily adopted by many jurisdictions) now bars grounding to pipes except within (as I recall) six feet of where the pipe enters the building, for precisely that reason.The use in modern times of teflon tape at joints in copper piping makes them unuseable for earth grounds even near the entry point to the building. A long (e.g. 2-3 meters) copper stake must be driven for a proper earth ground, or else a large copper mesh mat if the ground is rocky -- unless you are certain that the copper piping that you want to use extends a significant distance underground and unbroken.The purpose here is not to use the piping *as* a ground, but to ensure that the piping *is* at ground potential. Otherwise, if an electrical failure causes the pipe to reach a dangerous potential then so does the water in it, then so do the hands you're washing in that water. Thus if there's an electrical discontinuity in the piping it is even more important to earth bond any conductive piping/taps etc. that are on the non-earth side of that discontinuity. The same applies too to gas piping except here the principal risk is static, sparks and the subsequent explosion.
I think it is also important to note that NEC 250.52(B) prohibits gas piping as a grounding electrode(1990 or so). The gas pipe ceased as a grounding electrode due to the dielectric fitting at the meter. The gas company did not want a bond around the meter because it defeated the isolation fitting.
The presence of gas is not relevant, IIRC.In the old days, it was a big no no (at least according to the hourly wage fellows who actually do the work) to hook the gas line "as" ground other than any incidental grounding which ocurs in a gas furnace as an example.
Good place for resources is http://www.mikeholt.com in the forums. Decent community of knowledgeable folk there.
Good luck, and "no" do not use your body/fingers/arms/etc to connect various pieces of equipment to see if a voltage exists:-) That's best left to close friends who stand near electric fences.
I had problems in the mid 1990's in an older home where the galvanized water supply pipe was the primary ground. Over time, corrosion of the pipe reduced conductivity, and lightening storms toasted a few expensive items (e.g. ISDN gear, sun workstation, etc) before finally driving a few grounding bars into the soil in the basement.
Cheers, andy
Current thread:
- Re: Presumed RF Interference, (continued)
- Re: Presumed RF Interference David Lesher (Mar 05)
- Re: Presumed RF Interference Steven M. Bellovin (Mar 05)
- RE: Presumed RF Interference Scott Morris (Mar 05)
- Re: Presumed RF Interference Robert Boyle (Mar 05)
- Re: Presumed RF Interference Steven M. Bellovin (Mar 05)
- Re: Presumed RF Interference Martin Hannigan (Mar 05)
- Re: Presumed RF Interference Matthew Sullivan (Mar 06)
- Re: Presumed RF Interference Steven M. Bellovin (Mar 06)
- Re: Presumed RF Interference ww (Mar 06)
- Re: Presumed RF Interference Ian Mason (Mar 07)
- Re: Presumed RF Interference Andrew C Burnette (Mar 08)
- Re: Presumed RF Interference Randy Bush (Mar 06)
- Re: Presumed RF Interference Peter Dambier (Mar 06)
- Re: Presumed RF Interference Jay Hennigan (Mar 06)
- Re: Presumed RF Interference Iljitsch van Beijnum (Mar 05)