Re: shim6 @ NANOG (forwarded note from John Payne)

["Steven M. Bellovin" <smb () cs columbia edu>]

On Sat, 4 Mar 2006 13:59:18 +0100
Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis () kurtis pp se> wrote:

> On 3 mar 2006, at 04.13, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
>
> > I would be surprised if Shim6 going into actual deployed boxes was  
> > any faster.  So, if Shim6 was finalized today, which it won't be,  
> > in 2010 we might have 70% deployment and in 2012 we might have 90%  
> > deployment.
>
> OTOH Teredo, which isn't even a standard is in more or less all  
> Windows XP boxes....
Teredo is described in RFC 4380; it's a Proposed Standard.

I should note that Microsoft really believes in IPv6.  I wonder what
that means for its future....