Re: So -- what did happen to Panix?

[Pekka Savola <pekkas () netcore fi>]

On Wed, 25 Jan 2006, william(at)elan.net wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Jan 2006, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
> > It's now been 2.5 business days since Panix was taken out.  Do we know
> > what the root cause was?  It's hard to engineer a solution until we
> > know what the problem was.
>
> Is it really that hard to engineer this solution? We do have several of them 
> proposed (SBGP, soBGP, etc) and new WG is likely to be formed soon
> within IETF to finally work it out.

It'd be darn difficult to engineer a solution that would end up being 
deployed in any reasonable time if we don't know the requirements 
first.  Yes, there's a draft -- draft-ietf-rpsec-bgpsecrec-03.txt -- 
but it has been woefully lacking on the operator & deployment 
requirements.  More people should participate in the effort.

--
Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings