nanog mailing list archives
Re: Split flows across Domains
From: "Christopher L. Morrow" <christopher.morrow () verizonbusiness com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 18:29:44 +0000 (GMT)
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006, Joe Abley wrote:
On 24-Jan-2006, at 12:07, Robert E.Seastrom wrote:He said "via two different autonomous domains", which I took to mean two upstreams... and my understanding is that (on ciscos anyway) you're talking per-packet, not per-flow load balancing.If you can get two candidate routes for the same destination into the FIB, then you'll get per-flow load balancing as long as CEF is running, no?
that was my thought... and yes, it could get ugly for tcp services. Why would you knowningly induce this complication?
Current thread:
- Split flows across Domains Glen Kent (Jan 24)
- Re: Split flows across Domains Robert E . Seastrom (Jan 24)
- Re: Split flows across Domains Christopher L. Morrow (Jan 24)
- Re: Split flows across Domains Robert E . Seastrom (Jan 24)
- Re: Split flows across Domains Joe Abley (Jan 24)
- Re: Split flows across Domains Joe Abley (Jan 24)
- Re: Split flows across Domains Robert E . Seastrom (Jan 24)
- Re: Split flows across Domains Joe Abley (Jan 24)
- Re: Split flows across Domains Robert E . Seastrom (Jan 24)
- Re: Split flows across Domains Simon Leinen (Jan 25)
- Re: Split flows across Domains Christopher L. Morrow (Jan 24)
- Re: Split flows across Domains Christopher L. Morrow (Jan 24)
- Re: Split flows across Domains Matt Buford (Jan 24)
- Re: Split flows across Domains Joe Abley (Jan 24)
- Re: Split flows across Domains Steven M. Bellovin (Jan 25)
- Re: Split flows across Domains Robert E . Seastrom (Jan 24)