nanog mailing list archives
Re: Split flows across Domains
From: Joe Abley <jabley () isc org>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 13:05:21 -0500
On 24-Jan-2006, at 12:07, Robert E.Seastrom wrote:
He said "via two different autonomous domains", which I took to mean two upstreams... and my understanding is that (on ciscos anyway) you're talking per-packet, not per-flow load balancing.
If you can get two candidate routes for the same destination into the FIB, then you'll get per-flow load balancing as long as CEF is running, no?
Joe
Current thread:
- Split flows across Domains Glen Kent (Jan 24)
- Re: Split flows across Domains Robert E . Seastrom (Jan 24)
- Re: Split flows across Domains Christopher L. Morrow (Jan 24)
- Re: Split flows across Domains Robert E . Seastrom (Jan 24)
- Re: Split flows across Domains Joe Abley (Jan 24)
- Re: Split flows across Domains Joe Abley (Jan 24)
- Re: Split flows across Domains Robert E . Seastrom (Jan 24)
- Re: Split flows across Domains Joe Abley (Jan 24)
- Re: Split flows across Domains Robert E . Seastrom (Jan 24)
- Re: Split flows across Domains Simon Leinen (Jan 25)
- Re: Split flows across Domains Christopher L. Morrow (Jan 24)
- Re: Split flows across Domains Christopher L. Morrow (Jan 24)
- Re: Split flows across Domains Matt Buford (Jan 24)
- Re: Split flows across Domains Joe Abley (Jan 24)
- Re: Split flows across Domains Steven M. Bellovin (Jan 25)
- Re: Split flows across Domains Robert E . Seastrom (Jan 24)