nanog mailing list archives
RE: The Backhoe: A Real Cyberthreat?
From: "Bevan Slattery" <bevan () staff pipenetworks com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 07:27:13 +1000
-----Original Message----- From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu] On Behalf
Of Daniel Golding
Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 3:59 PM To: sgorman1 () gmu edu
If I was a terrorist, I'd rather try to take out points of fiber
concentration, and my tool would not be a backhoe. I won't elaborate, but I think most folks can > > figure out a few modalities of attack. You're comments are spot on. There are far more simpler, destructive, portable, scalable and inexpensive ways to achieve the same end. Any fibre provider knows what they are and hopes they never happen. An army of backhoes - that's funny. Cheers [b]
Current thread:
- Re: cyber-redundancy, (continued)
- Re: cyber-redundancy sgorman1 (Jan 19)
- Re: cyber-redundancy Martin Hannigan (Jan 19)
- Re: The Backhoe: A Real Cyberthreat? Daniel Golding (Jan 19)
- Re: The Backhoe: A Real Cyberthreat? Frank Coluccio (Jan 20)
- Re: The Backhoe: A Real Cyberthreat? sgorman1 (Jan 20)
- RE: The Backhoe: A Real Cyberthreat? Wallace Keith (Jan 20)
- Re: The Backhoe: A Real Cyberthreat? Martin Hannigan (Jan 21)
- Re: The Backhoe: A Real Cyberthreat? Michael . Dillon (Jan 23)
- Re: The Backhoe: A Real Cyberthreat? Martin Hannigan (Jan 21)
- RE: The Backhoe: A Real Cyberthreat? Church, Chuck (Jan 21)
- Re: The Backhoe: A Real Cyberthreat? Martin Hannigan (Jan 21)
- RE: The Backhoe: A Real Cyberthreat? Bevan Slattery (Jan 22)
- RE: The Backhoe: A Real Cyberthreat? Fergie (Jan 22)