nanog mailing list archives
Re: The Backhoe: A Real Cyberthreat?
From: Jerry Pasker <jerry () jerry org>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 14:29:35 -0600
While it is always fun to call the government stupid, or anyone else for that matter, there is a little more to the story.- For one you do not need a backhoe to cut fiber- Two, fiber carries a lot more than Internet traffic - cell phone, 911, financial tranactions, etc. etc. - Three, while it is very unlikely terrorists would only attack telecom infrastructure, a case can be made for a telecom attack that amplifies a primary conventional attack. The loss of communications would complicate things quite a bit.I'll agree it is very far fethced you could hatch an attack plan from FCC outage reports, but I would not call worrying about attacks on telecommunications infrastructure stupid. Enough sobriety though, please return to the flaming.
I agree with you on all points except the one you didn't make. :-)The point is: What's more damaging? Being open with the maps to EVERYONE can see where the problem areas are so they can design around them? (or chose not to) or pulling the maps, and reports, and sticking our heads in the sand, and hoping that security through obscurity works.
Current thread:
- Re: Stupidity: A Real Cyberthreat., (continued)
- Re: Stupidity: A Real Cyberthreat. A Satisfied Mind (Jan 19)
- Re: Stupidity: A Real Cyberthreat. Mark Smith (Jan 19)
- Re: Stupidity: A Real Cyberthreat. Alexander Harrowell (Jan 19)
- Re: The Backhoe: A Real Cyberthreat? Robert Boyle (Jan 19)
- Re: The Backhoe: A Real Cyberthreat? Randy Whitney (Jan 19)
- Re: The Backhoe: A Real Cyberthreat? Michael . Dillon (Jan 20)
- Re: The Backhoe: A Real Cyberthreat? sgorman1 (Jan 20)
- Re: The Backhoe: A Real Cyberthreat? Micheal Patterson (Jan 19)
- Re: The Backhoe: A Real Cyberthreat? Jerry Pasker (Jan 19)
- Re: The Backhoe: A Real Cyberthreat? Jim Popovitch (Jan 19)
- Re: The Backhoe: A Real Cyberthreat? Robert E . Seastrom (Jan 19)
- Re: The Backhoe: A Real Cyberthreat? sgorman1 (Jan 20)