nanog mailing list archives
Re: PI space and colocation
From: Pete Templin <petelists () templin org>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 14:02:01 -0600
Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
Is it a reasonable alternative to establish a BGP connection with the provider over ethernet?It is technical feasible, but I don't think 'reasonable'. Stub ASes are pollution on the 'Net.
OK, let's try a similar but different scenario. Customer has ISP A, adds ISP B ("you"). Customer intends to disconnect from ISP A. Assuming the customer told you, do you require the customer to start their connection with you as a private AS, do you require the customer to re-AS-number later, or do you assume the customer will re-multihome, etc.?
And what if the customer doesn't tell you that they're intending to leave ISP A? Do you police this, and if so how regularly?
(And yes, Patrick, IKYNAI. We'll pretend for the moment.) pt
Current thread:
- PI space and colocation up (Jan 18)
- Re: PI space and colocation Patrick W. Gilmore (Jan 18)
- Re: PI space and colocation Jon Lewis (Jan 18)
- Re: PI space and colocation Patrick W. Gilmore (Jan 18)
- Re: PI space and colocation Chris Adams (Jan 18)
- Re: PI space and colocation Patrick W. Gilmore (Jan 18)
- Re: PI space and colocation Michael Loftis (Jan 18)
- Re: PI space and colocation Stephen Sprunk (Jan 18)
- Re: PI space and colocation Tony Li (Jan 18)
- Re: PI space and colocation Patrick W. Gilmore (Jan 18)
- Re: PI space and colocation Jon Lewis (Jan 18)
- Re: PI space and colocation Patrick W. Gilmore (Jan 18)
- Re: PI space and colocation Patrick W. Gilmore (Jan 19)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: PI space and colocation Chris Ranch (Jan 18)
- Re: PI space and colocation Patrick W. Gilmore (Jan 18)