nanog mailing list archives
Re: PI space and colocation
From: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick () ianai net>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 17:19:37 -0500
On Jan 18, 2006, at 3:39 PM, Chris Ranch wrote:
In the past under these circumstances, if the customer still insists onBGP after I strongly recommeded just a static DFG, I'd peer with the customer with a private AS (64512-65535). Then they usually ask me to annouce a DFG to them. Sometimes they'd want a full table. Sigh.
If they are annoying, just let them use their own AS and make it a confederation.
You see it, they see it, the rest of the world doesn't.
At least they'd have the future flexibility of adding another provider without much change. I've personally done that too.
Easier if they're using their own ASN. -- TTFN, patrick
Current thread:
- Re: PI space and colocation, (continued)
- Re: PI space and colocation Chris Adams (Jan 18)
- Re: PI space and colocation Patrick W. Gilmore (Jan 18)
- Re: PI space and colocation Michael Loftis (Jan 18)
- Re: PI space and colocation Stephen Sprunk (Jan 18)
- Re: PI space and colocation Tony Li (Jan 18)
- Re: PI space and colocation Patrick W. Gilmore (Jan 18)
- Re: PI space and colocation Patrick W. Gilmore (Jan 19)
- Re: PI space and colocation Patrick W. Gilmore (Jan 18)