nanog mailing list archives
Re: So -- what did happen to Panix?
From: "Christopher L. Morrow" <christopher.morrow () verizonbusiness com>
Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 20:27:17 +0000 (GMT)
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006, Josh Karlin wrote:
Our primary concern is with keeping BGP stable until its replacement (e.g. sBGP) is ready for deployment.
veering off course for a tick: "I wonder how well sbgp/sobgp will behave in a world of 1million routes in the DFZ? 5 million? 10? 20?... " Someone better be thinking about that part of the problem as well with the coming doom of ipv6 :)
Current thread:
- Re: So -- what did happen to Panix? John Payne (Feb 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: So -- what did happen to Panix? Nick Feamster (Feb 03)
- Re: So -- what did happen to Panix? Josh Karlin (Feb 03)
- Re: So -- what did happen to Panix? Christopher L. Morrow (Feb 04)
- Re: So -- what did happen to Panix? Nick Feamster (Feb 04)
- Re: So -- what did happen to Panix? Joe Provo (Feb 05)
- Re: So -- what did happen to Panix? Martin Hannigan (Feb 05)
- Re: So -- what did happen to Panix? Nick Feamster (Feb 05)
- Re: So -- what did happen to Panix? Martin Hannigan (Feb 05)
- Re: So -- what did happen to Panix? Martin Hannigan (Feb 06)
- Re: So -- what did happen to Panix? Nick Feamster (Feb 07)
- Re: So -- what did happen to Panix? Christopher L. Morrow (Feb 07)
- Re: So -- what did happen to Panix? Josh Karlin (Feb 07)
- Re: So -- what did happen to Panix? Jeffrey Haas (Feb 08)
- Re: So -- what did happen to Panix? Josh Karlin (Feb 03)