nanog mailing list archives
Re: Transit LAN vs. Individual LANs
From: "Stephen Sprunk" <stephen () sprunk org>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 13:23:08 -0600
Thus spake "Scott Weeks" <surfer () mauigateway com>
From: "Stephen Sprunk" <stephen () sprunk org>ITYM two big transit LANs -- one must be prepared for a switch to fail.These're going to be router-to-router connections (each AR is connected to both CRs) and I had thought about tying them all into one VLAN vs. PTP Gig-E. I was just trying to find out the operational benefits of either design.
If your physical topology is going to be PTP links, then you should go with PTP at the logical level as well. Making one topology look like another is generally a bad idea.
S Stephen Sprunk "Stupid people surround themselves with smart CCIE #3723 people. Smart people surround themselves withK5SSS smart people who disagree with them." --Aaron Sorkin
Current thread:
- Re: Transit LAN vs. Individual LANs, (continued)
- Re: Transit LAN vs. Individual LANs Stephen Sprunk (Feb 25)
- Re: Transit LAN vs. Individual LANs Mark Smith (Feb 25)
- Re: Transit LAN vs. Individual LANs Mark Smith (Feb 25)
- Re: Transit LAN vs. Individual LANs Pete Templin (Feb 26)
- Re: Transit LAN vs. Individual LANs Owen DeLong (Feb 26)
- Re: Transit LAN vs. Individual LANs Stephen Sprunk (Feb 25)
- Re: Transit LAN vs. Individual LANs Stephen Sprunk (Feb 28)
- Re: Transit LAN vs. Individual LANs Stephen Sprunk (Feb 28)