nanog mailing list archives
Re: protocols that don't meet the need...
From: Michael.Dillon () btradianz com
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 10:23:56 +0000
opportunity for those who can't justify the extra trips to at least have some feedback to try and close the loop on protocol design.
Joint meetings are all well and good but are not necessary for feedback. NANOG folks can join IETF mailing lists here http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/wg-dir.html and post their feedback. Or, better yet, they can write their studied opinions in an Internet Draft and submit that to the IETF. There are guidelines and a checklist here http://www.ietf.org/ID.html for those who are willing to take the time. Note that because this document is a draft, submitted for discussion and comment, it is not necessary to be as complete as an RFC. Some drafts that eventually become RFCs, go through many revisions. The point is that the IETF is open to receiving feedback, ideas, opinions, in written form. You don't have to go to a meeting and argue your case in a room full of hostile vendors and programmers. A steady stream of Internet drafts and mailing list comments from operators will probably have more effect that a few meeting visits. --Michael Dillon
Current thread:
- Re: IRS goes IPv6!, (continued)
- Re: IRS goes IPv6! Christopher L. Morrow (Feb 14)
- Re: IRS goes IPv6! Vicky Røde (Feb 14)
- Re: IRS goes IPv6! Bruce Pinsky (Feb 14)
- protocols that don't meet the need... Tony Hain (Feb 14)
- Re: protocols that don't meet the need... Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 14)
- RE: protocols that don't meet the need... Tony Hain (Feb 14)
- Re: protocols that don't meet the need... Jared Mauch (Feb 14)
- Re: protocols that don't meet the need... Marshall Eubanks (Feb 14)
- Re: protocols that don't meet the need... Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 14)
- Re: IRS goes IPv6! Christopher L. Morrow (Feb 14)
- Re: protocols that don't meet the need... Per Heldal (Feb 14)
- Re: protocols that don't meet the need... william(at)elan.net (Feb 14)
- Re: protocols that don't meet the need... Michael . Dillon (Feb 15)
- shim6 rides again (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Edward B. DREGER (Feb 15)
- Re: shim6 rides again (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Randy Bush (Feb 15)
- Re: shim6 rides again (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Edward B. DREGER (Feb 15)
- Re: shim6 rides again (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) David Meyer (Feb 15)
- Re: shim6 rides again (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Per Heldal (Feb 15)
- Re: shim6 rides again (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Edward B. DREGER (Feb 15)
- Re: IRS goes IPv6! Matt Ghali (Feb 15)