nanog mailing list archives
Re: IRS goes IPv6!
From: "Andrew Dul" <andrew.dul () quark net>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 17:00:31 +0000
-------Original Message------- From: Christopher L. Morrow <christopher.morrow () verizonbusiness com> Subject: Re: IRS goes IPv6! Sent: 14 Feb '06 08:31 On Tue, 14 Feb 2006, Jeroen Massar wrote: > I Ar Es, > > At least they have received the 2610:30::/32 allocation from ARIN. > Lets see if they how taxing they find IPv6 ;) so.. this is surprising why? the us-gov mandate for ipv6 uptake will mean lots of us-gov folks will be spinning up justifications that they are a 'service provider' and need a /32... cause they won't accept PA space (or I don't think they will accept PA space as a long term solution) ...
So isn't this yet another reason why we need a rational PI policy, so organizations don't have make up reasons why they are LIRs.
Current thread:
- Re: protocols that don't meet the need..., (continued)
- Re: protocols that don't meet the need... Marshall Eubanks (Feb 14)
- Re: protocols that don't meet the need... Per Heldal (Feb 14)
- Re: protocols that don't meet the need... william(at)elan.net (Feb 14)
- Re: protocols that don't meet the need... Michael . Dillon (Feb 15)
- shim6 rides again (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Edward B. DREGER (Feb 15)
- Re: shim6 rides again (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Randy Bush (Feb 15)
- Re: shim6 rides again (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Edward B. DREGER (Feb 15)
- Re: shim6 rides again (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) David Meyer (Feb 15)
- Re: shim6 rides again (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Per Heldal (Feb 15)
- Re: shim6 rides again (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) Edward B. DREGER (Feb 15)
- Re: IRS goes IPv6! Matt Ghali (Feb 15)