nanog mailing list archives
Re: ams-ix - worth using?
From: James Blessing <james.blessing () entagroup com>
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 11:00:30 +0100
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 matthew zeier wrote:
Does it simply provide an easy way to privately connect to transit and peers? Or can I also go crazy and peer with anyone who wants to peer (like in the olden day!) ?
EU peering is very different from US peering (as many have found out when the hop across the pond) if you can find which networks the traffic is going to then look at LINX, AMS-IX and DE-CIX to see where you will get the best coverage then you will find that many networks will peer (but check their peering rules). Have a look at peeringdb.com for more help J - -- Entanet International http://www.enta.net/ ps we'll peer :) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFE7Xi+R+KszLBLUT8RAslzAJ49qBvCjEkaUL7nh/lencBpJCo1ZgCgpE8h ueup97XLYeLQyae6+wvVPIw= =eyWQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Current thread:
- ams-ix - worth using? matthew zeier (Aug 23)
- Re: ams-ix - worth using? Mikael Abrahamsson (Aug 23)
- Re: ams-ix - worth using? James Blessing (Aug 24)
- Re: ams-ix - worth using? Ian Mason (Aug 24)
- AW: ams-ix - worth using? Gunther Stammwitz (Aug 24)
- Re: ams-ix - worth using? Richard A Steenbergen (Aug 24)
- AW: ams-ix - worth using? Gunther Stammwitz (Aug 25)
- Re: AW: ams-ix - worth using? Patrick W. Gilmore (Aug 25)
- Re: ams-ix - worth using? Niels Bakker (Aug 25)
- AW: ams-ix - worth using? Gunther Stammwitz (Aug 24)
- Re: AW: ams-ix - worth using? Hank Nussbacher (Aug 24)
- Re: AW: ams-ix - worth using? Richard A Steenbergen (Aug 24)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: ams-ix - worth using? Miquel van Smoorenburg (Aug 23)