nanog mailing list archives

Re: i am not a list moderator, but i do have a request


From: "Fergie" <fergdawg () netzero net>
Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 22:03:53 GMT


My personal opinion is that _some_ bitnet issues are indeed
relevant to the NANOG list, but that's just me. :-)

I mean, it _does_ affect network ops at times...

- ferg



-- Thomas Kuehling <thomas.kuehling () packetloss biz> wrote:
Dear Fergie,

On So, 2006-08-13 at 21:49 +0000, Fergie wrote:
For what it's worth, there _is_ a botnet discussison list:

General information about the mailing list is at:

 http://www.whitestar.linuxbox.org/mailman/listinfo/botnets

thanks, didn't know about it. But isn't it still usefull, when urgent
matters concerning botnets will still discussed on the nanog-list?
Please let me disabussed to it, but it's just my opinion.

Regards
Thomas

- ferg


-- Thomas Kuehling <thomas.kuehling () packetloss biz> wrote:

Dear all,

On So, 2006-08-13 at 15:17 -0600, Danny McPherson wrote:

Interestingly enough, I lurk here 99.999% of the time. I comment
on this thread and folks ask to move it to a non-SP mailing list?   
Perhaps
non-operational, but this certainly has direct implications on SPs and
I'm of the opinion it's quite relevant - well, certainly as relevant  
as the
past recent threads:

i waited to view, where this discussion will go, but that's exactly the
point. In my opinion, it's really interesting and necessary to be
informed about topics like botnets. It would be a failure, when this
topics won't be discussed anylonger on this list. Also it isn't that a
big problem, to filter topics for himself for relevance or of no
relevance.

Just my two cents.

Regards
Thomas Kuehling


--
Thomas Kuehling - TK2325-RIPE
Hoehestrasse 28 - 61348 Bad Homburg vor der Höhe - Hessen
Jahnstrasse 6 - 26219 Boesel - Niedersachsen

--
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
 Engineering Architecture for the Internet
 fergdawg(at)netzero.net
 ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/


Current thread: