nanog mailing list archives
Re: SORBS Contact
From: "Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr." <LarrySheldon () cox net>
Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2006 15:46:00 -0500
Michael Nicks wrote:
Actually I think this thread progressed from someone getting dirty blocks, to complaining about liberal-listing-RBLs (yes SORBS is one), to RBLs defending themselves and their obviously broken practices. We should not have to jump through hoops to satisfy your requirements.
Fair enough.End users ought not to have the functionality of email destroyed because originating SP's won't show due diligence in preventing abuse of the network.
If you don't like SORBS, don't use it. Don't send email to anybody who does. -- Requiescas in pace o email Ex turpi causa non oritur actio http://members.cox.net/larrysheldon/
Current thread:
- Re: SORBS Contact, (continued)
- Re: SORBS Contact Matthew Sullivan (Aug 09)
- Question for the List Maintaners -- (Re: SORBS Contact) Steve Sobol (Aug 09)
- Re: Question for the List Maintaners -- (Re: SORBS Contact) Matthew Sullivan (Aug 09)
- Re: SORBS Contact william(at)elan.net (Aug 08)
- Re: SORBS Contact Matthew Sullivan (Aug 08)
- Re: SORBS Contact Albert Meyer (Aug 09)
- Re: SORBS Contact Andrew D Kirch (Aug 09)
- Re: SORBS Contact Michael Nicks (Aug 09)
- Re: SORBS Contact Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. (Aug 09)
- Re: SORBS Contact Allan Poindexter (Aug 09)
- Re: SORBS Contact Matthew Sullivan (Aug 09)
- Re: SORBS Contact Allan Poindexter (Aug 09)
- Re: SORBS Contact Christopher L. Morrow (Aug 09)
- RE: SORBS Contact Robert J. Hantson (Aug 09)
- RE: SORBS Contact Christopher L. Morrow (Aug 09)
- Re: SORBS Contact Steve Atkins (Aug 09)
- Re: SORBS Contact Rich Kulawiec (Aug 10)