nanog mailing list archives

Re: AT&T: 15 Mbps Internet connections "irrelevant"

From: Michael.Dillon () btradianz com
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2006 09:50:36 +0100

and they don't get that complicating the network to get
service differentiation so they can justify charging
differentiation will make the business even less profitable.
see geoff's apricot preso.


No doubt Randy is referring to Geoff Huston's recent presentation
at APRICOT 2006 in Perth, Australia. 
http://www.apricot2006.net/slides/conf/wednesday/2006-02-28-convergence.pdf

--Michael Dillon

Current thread:

Re: AT&T: 15 Mbps Internet connections "irrelevant" Sean Donelan (Apr 01)
- Re: AT&T: 15 Mbps Internet connections "irrelevant" David Lesher (Apr 01)
  - Re: AT&T: 15 Mbps Internet connections "irrelevant" Randy Bush (Apr 02)
    - Re: AT&T: 15 Mbps Internet connections "irrelevant" Michael . Dillon (Apr 03)
    - Listen to all the companies spin (was Re: AT&T: 15 Mbps Internet connections "irrelevant") Sean Donelan (Apr 03)
- Re: AT&T: 15 Mbps Internet connections "irrelevant" Joe Provo (Apr 01)
- Re: AT&T: 15 Mbps Internet connections "irrelevant" Daniel Senie (Apr 01)
  - Re: AT&T: 15 Mbps Internet connections "irrelevant" Sean Donelan (Apr 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: AT&T: 15 Mbps Internet connections "irrelevant" Marshall Eubanks (Apr 01)
  - Re: AT&T: 15 Mbps Internet connections "irrelevant" Jon Lewis (Apr 01)
    - Re: AT&T: 15 Mbps Internet connections "irrelevant" Edward B. DREGER (Apr 01)
    - Re: AT&T: 15 Mbps Internet connections "irrelevant" Robert Boyle (Apr 01)
- RE: AT&T: 15 Mbps Internet connections "irrelevant" Frank Bulk (Apr 01)
  - RE: AT&T: 15 Mbps Internet connections "irrelevant" Edward B. DREGER (Apr 01)

(Thread continues...)