Re: Spam filtering bcps [was Re: Open Letter to D-Link about their NTP vandalism]

[Tony Finch <dot () dotat at>]

On Wed, 12 Apr 2006, Matthew Black wrote:
> I haven't seen any succinct justification for providing a
> 550 message rejection for positively-identified spam versus
> silently dropping the message.

If you are wrong about the message being spam, then the sender gets a
bounce.

Tony.
-- 
f.a.n.finch  <dot () dotat at>  http://dotat.at/
BERWICK ON TWEED TO WHITBY: WEST OR SOUTHWEST 5 OR 6, PERHAPS INCREASING 7
LATER IN NORTH. RAIN AT FIRST. MAINLY GOOD. SLIGHT OR MODERATE.