nanog mailing list archives

Re: Open Letter to D-Link about their NTP vandalism


From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 13:52:29 -0400

On Tue, 11 Apr 2006 02:04:39 EDT, Alain Hebert said:
Paul Vixie wrote:
that creates new liability, and isn't realistic in today's litigious world.
    It is DIX resources/equipements...  they are not oblige to offer 
reliable/secure/valide/etc services to anybody outside their clients.

    It like saying that blacklist services like spamcop should be liable 
for mail servers XYZ deleting your email.

Paul is speaking from experience, having dealt with altogether too many people
who *do* believe that services Spamcop should be liable...

Even if it isn't a *legal* liability where you're forced to pay out damages,
having to carry '$100,000 legal fees' on the balance sheet is an accounting
liability, not an asset....

Attachment: _bin
Description:


Current thread: