nanog mailing list archives
RE: Level 3's side of the story
From: Rik van Riel <riel () surriel com>
Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2005 12:41:07 -0400 (EDT)
On Sat, 8 Oct 2005, Jon Lewis wrote:
If you're multihomed and using Cogent as a cheap bandwidth whore, does it matter if their cheap bandwidth gives you 155k routes instead of 168k routes? After all, if its cheap and off-loads enough traffic from your more expensive 168k route circuits, isn't it doing what you bought it for?
I wonder if Cogent customers can get their money back if more than 0.1% of their packets go to L3 single-homed networks ;) http://www.cogentco.com/htdocs/internet.php?current=10 Product Features: FULL SLA: Our SLA guarantees 99.99% network availability, 99.9% packet delivery, less than 50 milliseconds roundtrip latency and proactive outage notification within 15 minutes. -- "Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it." - Brian W. Kernighan
Current thread:
- Re: Level 3's side of the story, (continued)
- Re: Level 3's side of the story Richard A Steenbergen (Oct 08)
- Re: Level 3's side of the story Patrick W. Gilmore (Oct 08)
- Re: Level 3's side of the story Stephen J. Wilcox (Oct 08)
- Re: Level 3's side of the story jmalcolm (Oct 09)
- Re: Level 3's side of the story James (Oct 08)
- Re: Level 3's side of the story John Curran (Oct 08)
- Re: Level 3's side of the story Patrick W. Gilmore (Oct 08)
- Re: Level 3's side of the story Matthew Crocker (Oct 08)
- Re: Level 3's side of the story Stephen J. Wilcox (Oct 08)
- Re: Level 3's side of the story Richard A Steenbergen (Oct 08)
- RE: Level 3's side of the story Rik van Riel (Oct 08)