nanog mailing list archives
Re: Level 3's side of the story
From: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick () ianai net>
Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2005 12:13:13 -0400
On Oct 8, 2005, at 11:42 AM, John Curran wrote:
Cold potato routing alone is insufficient in many cases, and some form ofsettlement becomes necessary. http://www.cctec.com/maillists/nanog/historical/9808/msg00517.html
This does not in any way explain why cold-potato routing is insufficient.
But I seriously doubt a consensus will be found in this forum, or between John & me. :)
Let's just say that there _are_ technical means to make "traffic imbalances" either (close to) fair, or reverse the financial burden. And almost every hoster I know (and certainly some of the ones involved in the original BBN / Exodus / Above.Net / etc. fracas) were perfectly willing to take on more of the cost so the eyeball network actually has a financial incentive to peer.
-- TTFN, patrick
Current thread:
- Re: Level 3's side of the story, (continued)
- Re: Level 3's side of the story Leo Bicknell (Oct 08)
- Re: Level 3's side of the story Will Yardley (Oct 08)
- Re: Level 3's side of the story Richard A Steenbergen (Oct 08)
- Re: Level 3's side of the story Patrick W. Gilmore (Oct 08)
- Re: Level 3's side of the story Richard A Steenbergen (Oct 08)
- Re: Level 3's side of the story Patrick W. Gilmore (Oct 08)
- Re: Level 3's side of the story Stephen J. Wilcox (Oct 08)
- Re: Level 3's side of the story jmalcolm (Oct 09)
- Re: Level 3's side of the story James (Oct 08)
- Re: Level 3's side of the story John Curran (Oct 08)
- Re: Level 3's side of the story Patrick W. Gilmore (Oct 08)
- Re: Level 3's side of the story Matthew Crocker (Oct 08)
- Re: Level 3's side of the story Stephen J. Wilcox (Oct 08)
- Re: Level 3's side of the story Richard A Steenbergen (Oct 08)
- RE: Level 3's side of the story Rik van Riel (Oct 08)