nanog mailing list archives
Re: Level 3's side of the story
From: John Curran <jcurran () istaff org>
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2005 21:18:41 -0400
At 4:41 PM -0700 10/7/05, william(at)elan.net wrote:
BTW - it sounds like maybe somebody was required to give 30 days notice of service changes to certain customers with good laywers....
In any industry, it only takes a handful of consumers impacted through no fault of their own to generate significant political & regulatory attention. Reasonable-sounding explanations cannot stand if they imply that thousands of innocent parties can be impacted without notice. /John
Current thread:
- Re: Level 3's side of the story, (continued)
- Re: Level 3's side of the story Ken Leland (Oct 07)
- Re: Level 3's side of the story Richard A Steenbergen (Oct 07)
- Re: Level 3's side of the story Kevin Loch (Oct 07)
- Re: Level 3's side of the story Robert E . Seastrom (Oct 08)
- Re: Level 3's side of the story Simon Leinen (Oct 16)
- Re: Level 3's side of the story Daniel Karrenberg (Oct 17)
- Re: Level 3's side of the story william(at)elan.net (Oct 07)
- Re: Level 3's side of the story Deepak Jain (Oct 07)
- Re: Level 3's side of the story John Curran (Oct 07)
- Message not available
- Re: Level 3's side of the story John Curran (Oct 07)
- Message not available
- Re: Level 3's side of the story John Curran (Oct 07)
- Message not available
- Re: Level 3's side of the story John Curran (Oct 07)
- Message not available
- Re: Level 3's side of the story John Curran (Oct 08)
- Message not available
- Re: Level 3's side of the story John Curran (Oct 09)
- RE: Level 3's side of the story Jon Lewis (Oct 07)
- Re: Level 3's side of the story Richard A Steenbergen (Oct 07)
- Re: Level 3's side of the story Richard A Steenbergen (Oct 07)