nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering
From: Tom Sands <tsands () rackspace com>
Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2005 15:12:20 -0500
Yeah, we just noticed the same.. BGP routing table entry for 38.0.0.0/8, version 23735501 Paths: (3 available, best #1, table Default-IP-Routing-Table) Flag: 0x220 Advertised to peer-groups: core Advertised to non peer-group peers: 64.39.2.107 212.100.225.49 3356 174, (received & used) 195.50.112.205 from 195.50.112.205 (4.68.0.240) Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, external, best Community: 3356:3 3356:86 3356:575 3356:666 3356:2010 Charles Gucker wrote:
On 07 Oct 2005 19:00:46 +0000, Paul Vixie <vixie () vix com> wrote:cgucker () onesc net (Charles Gucker) writes:Ok, as I understand it, Level3 can get Cogent connectivity back simply be restoring the peering that they suspended, right?First off, that's not my quote. ;-) Second, it would appear routes are once again beng exchanged between Level(3) and Cogent. BGP routing table entry for 209.244.0.0/14, version 103309841 Paths: (1 available, best #1, table Default-IP-Routing-Table) Not advertised to any peer 174 3356, (aggregated by 3356 4.68.0.12) 66.28.1.1 from 66.28.1.1 (66.28.1.1) Origin IGP, metric 1000, localpref 100, valid, external, atomic-aggregate, best Community: 174:21000 16631:1000From an outside view, it seems like Level(3) caved in to customerdemand, but what the true outcome is, nobody will know [publically]. charlesthat's what this press release says: http://www.cogentco.com/htdocs/press.php?func=detail&person_id=62 disclaimer-- my employer has friendly relations with both Level(3) and Cogent. -- Paul Vixie
-- ------------------------------------------------------ Tom Sands Chief Network EngineerRackspace Managed Hosting (210)447-4065
------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering, (continued)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering James Spenceley (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Richard A Steenbergen (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Daniel Roesen (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Charles Gucker (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Daniel Roesen (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Lewis Butler (Oct 07)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Charles Gucker (Oct 07)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Patrick W. Gilmore (Oct 07)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Paul Vixie (Oct 07)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Charles Gucker (Oct 07)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Tom Sands (Oct 07)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Patrick W. Gilmore (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Daniel Roesen (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Richard A Steenbergen (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Patrick W. Gilmore (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Richard A Steenbergen (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Patrick W. Gilmore (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering John Payne (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering sigma (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering Micheal Patterson (Oct 05)
- Re: Cogent/Level 3 depeering John Payne (Oct 05)